QAWĀ‘ID AL-TAFSĪR: THE APPLICATION OF SYNTAX, MORPHOLOGY, AND RHETORIC BY M. QURAISH SHIHAB (B. 1944)

Main Article Content

Abur Hamdi Usman
Mohd Farid Ravi Abdullah
Azwar Azwar

Abstract

M. Quraish Shihab (Shihab) is one of the great exegetes in the Indonesian archipelago. He is well known for applying QawÄ‘id al-TafsÄ«r in interpreting the Quran. These rules are popular among many exegetes to support their interpretations aligned with the teachings and goals of the Quran. Furthermore, to ensure the interpretations do not deviate from the valid message of the Quran. This paper adopts an analytical approach in Tafsir Al-Mishbah to describe the Syntax, Morphology, and Rhetoric of selected Quranic verses. It shows that QawÄ'id al-TafsÄ«r is an essential tool in Quranic exegesis. Mastering these rules can help interpret certain verses that have similar meanings. This paper also proves that Shihab had adopted QawÄ‘id al-TafsÄ«r that earlier exegetes used.

Article Details

How to Cite
Usman, A. H., Abdullah, M. F. R., & Azwar, A. (2024). QAWĀ‘ID AL-TAFSĪR: THE APPLICATION OF SYNTAX, MORPHOLOGY, AND RHETORIC BY M. QURAISH SHIHAB (B. 1944). Al-Bayan: Jurnal Studi Ilmu Al- Qur’an Dan Tafsir, 9(1), 25–37. https://doi.org/10.15575/al-bayan.v9i1.16266
Section
Articles

References

Abdul Kadir, M. N., Usman, A. H., Ishak, H., Ismail, I., & Mohd Saad, M. F. (2020). The commandments and prohibitions rules of interpretation in Quranic exegesis. International Journal of Psychosocial Rehabilitation, 24(6), 2183–2190. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.37200/IJPR/V24I6/PR260208

Abdul Rahman, N. N. (2008). The teaching and learning of Usul Alfiqh in public universities in Malaysia: reality and challenges. Jurnal Syariah, 16(3), 523–536. https://sare.um.edu.my/index.php/JS/article/view/22755

Adam, A. Y., & Altine, Z. (2019). In-depth analysis on the Methodology of Mufassirun and Muhaddithun. South Asian Research Journal of Humanities and Social Sciences, 1(1), 15–20. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.28918/jupe.v18i1.3789

‘Āá¸il al-DimashqÄ«, A. Ḥafá¹£ ‘Umar. (1998). al-LubÄb fÄ« ‘UlÅ«m al-KitÄb (Vol. 2). DÄr al-Kutub al-‘Ilmiyyah.

al-GhalÄyaynÄ«, M. (1989). JÄmi‘ al-DurÅ«s al-‘Arabiah (Vol. 1). al-Maktabah al-‘Aá¹£riah.

al-Jawziyyah, I. Q. (1996). BadÄ’i‘ al-FawÄ’id (Vol. 1). Maktabah NazÄr Musá¹­afÄ al-BÄz.

al-JurjÄnÄ«, A. M. (1985). al-Ta‘rifÄt (Vol. 1). DÄr al-KitÄb al-Mu‘Äá¹£ir.

al-Qaá¹­á¹­Än, M. (1992). MabÄḥith fÄ« ‘UlÅ«m al-Qur’Än. Mu’assasah al-RisÄlah.

al-Qurá¹­ubÄ«, A. ‘Abdillah M. (1964). al-JÄmi‘ li AḥkÄm al-Qur’Än (Vol. 8). DÄr al-Kutub al-Miá¹£riyyah.

al-Sabt, K. ‘UthmÄn. (2001). QawÄ‘id al-TafsÄ«r Jam‘an wa DirÄsah (Vol. 1). DÄr ibn ‘AffÄn.

al-Sa‘dÄ«, A. R. (2001). al-QawÄ‘id al-ḤisÄn fÄ« TafsÄ«r al-Qur’Än. Mu’assasah al-RisÄlah.

al-ShawkÄnÄ«, M. ‘AlÄ«. (1993). atḥ al-Qaá¸Ä«r al-JÄmi‘ Bayna Fannay al-DirÄyah wa al-RiwÄyah min ‘Ilm al-TafsÄ«r (Vol. 1). DÄr al-ḤadÄ«th.

al-SuyÅ«á¹­Ä«, J. ‘Abd al-R. (1996). al-ItqÄn FÄ« ‘UlÅ«m al-Qur’Än (Vol. 2). Maktabah DÄr al-TurÄth.

al-ṬabarÄ«, A. J. M. J. (2001). TafsÄ«r al-ṬabarÄ« (Vol. 4). Markaz al-Buḥūth wa al-DirÄsah al-‘Arabiyah wa al-IslÄmiyyah.

al-ZarkashÄ«, B. M. (1988). al-BurhÄn fÄ« ‘UlÅ«m al-Qur’Än (Vol. 4). DÄr al-TurÄth.

‘ĀshÅ«r, M. ṬÄhir. (1984). al-TaḥrÄ«r wa al-TanwÄ«r (Vol. 3). DÄr SaḥnÅ«n.

Campanini, M. (2005). Qur’an and Science: A Hermeneutical Approach. Journal of Qur'anic Studies, 7(1), 48-63. https://www.jstor.org/stable/25728164.

Cavanagh, S. (1997). Content analysis: concepts, methods, and applications. Nurse Researcher, 4(3), 5–16.

Creswell, J. W., & Creswell, J. D. (2017). Research Design Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approaches (5th ed.). SAGE Publications, Inc.

Downeâ€Wamboldt, B. (1992). Content analysis: method, applications, and issues. Health Care for Women International, 13(3), 313–321.

Elo, S., & Kyngäs, H. (2008). The qualitative content analysis process. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 62(1), 107–115.

Embong, A. H., & Hanapi, M. S. (2017). The Application Methods of the Holy Quran’s Interpretations in Islamic-Related Research. International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, 7(2), 521–535. https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.6007/IJARBSS/v7-i2/2661

Gusmian, I. (2003). Khazanah tafsir Indonesia dari hermeneutika hingga ideologi. Teraju.

Gusmian, I. (2015). EPISTEMOLOGI TAFSIR Al-QUR’AN KONTEMPORER. Al-A’raf : Jurnal Pemikiran Islam Dan Filsafat, 12(2), 21. https://doi.org/10.22515/ajpif.v12i2.1173

Hsieh, H.-F., & Shannon, S. E. (2005). Three approaches to qualitative content analysis. Qualitative Health Research, 15(9), 1277–1288.

Ibn ‘Aá¹­iyyah, A. M. (2001). al-Muḥarrar al-WajÄ«z fÄ« TafsÄ«r al-KitÄb al-‘AzÄ«z (Vol. 3). DÄr al-Kutub al-‘Ilmiyyah.

Ibn Manẓūr, M. (2008). LisÄn al-‘Arab (Vol. 3). Dar Sadir.

Ibrahim, M., & Usman, A. H. (2013). Rules of M. Quraish Shihab’s Interpretation in Tafsir Al-mishbah. World Journal of Islamic History and Civilization, 3(3), 101–108. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.5829/idosi.wjihc.2013.3.3.3303

Kamaruddin, K., & Ab Aziz, N. S. (2021). Aplikasi Kaedah Analisis Lafaz yang Diambil Kira dari Sudut Kaedah Petunjuk pada Makna dalam Kaedah Penyelidikan Berteraskan Islam. BITARA International Journal of Civilizational Studies and Human Sciences, 4(4), 63–76. https://bitarajournal.com/index.php/bitarajournal/article/view/247

Kamaruddin, K. B., & Hanapi, M. S. bin. (2021). The Islamic Knowledge Approach as a Qualitative Data Analysis Method in Islamic-Based Research. International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, 11(2). https://doi.org/10.6007/IJARBSS/v11-i2/8661

Mat Sin, N. Z. (2014). The Definition of Qawa’id Al-Tadabbur: A Comparison Analysis with Qawa’id Al-Tafsir. International Journal of Quranic Research, 6(1), 63–82. https://doi.org/10.22452/quranica.vol6no1.5

Mohamad, S., Usman, A. H., Saad, M. F. A. M., Kadir, M. N. A., & Ali, M. A. M. (2015). The Rules of Interpretation: How do Al-QirÄ’Ät Applied in Shihab’s Exegesis? Mediterranean Journal of Social Sciences, 6(1), 97–104. https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.5901/mjss.2015.v6n1s1p97

Morgan, D. L. (1993). Qualitative content analysis: a guide to paths not taken. Qualitative Health Research, 3(1), 112–121.

Muslim, A. Ḥusayn. (2005). al-JÄmi‘ al-á¹¢aḥīḥ (Vol. 3). DÄr al-JÄ«l.

Musá¹­afÄ, I. (2001). al-Mu‘jam al-WasÄ«á¹­ (Vol. 2). DÄr al-Da‘wah.

Nofmiyati, N., & Miftahuddin, M. (2020). Kaedah Tafsir Abdur Rahman Al-Sa’di Dalam Kitab Al-Qawaid Al-Hisan Li Al-Tafsir Al-Qur’an. Madania: Jurnal Ilmu-Ilmu Keislaman, 10(1), 29. https://doi.org/10.24014/jiik.v10i1.10817

Schreier, M. (2012). Qualitative content analysis in practice. Sage publications.

Shihab, M. Q. (2006). Menabur pesan ilahi: al-Qur’an dan dinamika kehidupan masyarakat. Lentera Hati.

Shihab, M. Q. (2010). Tafsir al-MishbÄh: Pesan, kesan dan keserasian al-Qur’an (Vol. 1). Lentera Hati.

Shihab, M. Q. (2011). Membumikan al-Qur’an jilid 2: Memfungsikan wahyu dalam kehidupan. Lentera Hati.

Syofrianisda, S. (2018). Relevansi Dan Korelasi Qaw’id Al-Tafsir Dengan Ushul Al-Fiqh. Al Hurriyah: Jurnal Hukum Islam, 2(2), 203–218. https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.30983/alhurriyah.v2i2.368

Usman, A. H., Avivy, A. L. F., & Abdullah, M. F. R. B. (2021). AsbÄb al-NuzÅ«l and The Rules of Interpretation: Some Notes on M. Quraish Shihab’s Views. Jurnal Penelitian, 18(1), 55–66.

Usman, A. H., Fattah, M., Mohd Amin, M. F., Wan Abdullah, W. N., Othman, F. M., & Abdul Kadir, M. N. (2015). The Rules of Interpretation: How Do Al-‘Äm and Al-KhÄá¹£ Applied in Shihab’s Exegesis? Mediterranean Journal of Social Sciences. https://doi.org/10.5901/mjss.2015.v6n4s1p523

Usman, A. H., Ibrahim, M., & Abdullah, M. F. R. (2021). Application of The Rules of Commandments and Prohibitions in Tafsir Al-Mishbah. Taqaddumi: Journal of Quran and Hadith Studies, 1(1), 103. https://doi.org/10.12928/taqaddumi.v1i1.4221