Ma'na Cum Maghza as Sahiron Syamsuddin's Approach to the Science of the Qur'an and Tafsir


Ahmad Midrar Sa'dina(1*), Farhan Muhammad(2)

(1) Pesantren Salafiyah Khaira Ummah Sumedang, Indonesia
(2) Pondok Pesantren As Syifa Sagalaherang Subang, Indonesia
(*) Corresponding Author

Abstract


The relevance of how the Al-Qur’an is interpreted in the modern day is explicitly covered in this essay. This approach’s primary goal is to investigate the meaning and historical relevance of the verses under interpretation and then transform that historical significance into dynamic significance. The following procedures are used to determine historical meaning and significance: (a) textual analysis, (b) intratextuality, (c) intertextuality, (d) examination of the historical setting in which the verse was revealed, and (e) reconstruction of the verse’s major meaning. To determine the verse’s dynamic significance, the following procedures are followed: (a) classifying the verse, (b) contextualizing and re-actualizing the verse’s significance, (c) identifying the verse’s symbolic meaning, and (d) fortifying the verse’s construction with knowledge to assist others. It is impossible to divorce the research methodology employed in this study from the realization of the ma’na-cum-maghza approach’s urgency. Because content analysis is used in this study, Sahiron’s work in applying the ma’na-cum-maghza methodology to QS Al-Maidah (5): 51 may be thoroughly examined. Similarly, the qualitative method used in this study can interpret ma’na-cum-maghza in the context of today, particularly in light of modern interpretations, which are supported by information the author gathered from books, documents, journals, and notes. Some observations about Ma’na-cum-Maghza. The author explains the connecting bridge as an explanation of ma’na-cum-maghza by utilizing source triangulation to find the validity of the data and sample Q 5:51, which Sahiron interpreted. This produces research that is compatible with the disclosure of the urgency of ma’na-cum-maghza.

Keywords


Hermeneutics; qualitative method; Qur’anic interpretation; symbolic meaning; textual analysis.

Full Text:

PDF

References


Akbar, F. H., Anshari, F. A., & Rahman, H. (2020). Al-Quran dalam Tafsiran Dekonstruksi dan Rekonstruksi (M. T. Rahman & E. Zulaiha (eds.); 1st ed.). Prodi S2 Studi Agama-Agama UIN Sunan Gunung Djati Bandung.

Amir, A. M., & Hamzah, G. (2019). Dinamika dan Terapan Metodologi Tafsir Kontekstual. Al-Izzah: Jurnal Hasil-Hasil Penelitian, 14(1), 1–17.

Chaer, H., & Rasyad, A. (2019). Hermeneutika Al-Qur’an Suroh Al-Isro’Ayat 1 Sebuah Tinjauan Kosmologi. PALAPA, 7(1), 66–98.

Fadilah, A. (2019). Ma’na-Cum-Maghza Sebagai Pendekatan Kontekstual dalam Perkembangan Wacana Hermeneutika Alquran di Indonesia. Quran and Hadith Studies, 8(1), 1.

Hanafi, H. (1991). Min al-Aqidah ila al-Tsaurah. Kairo: Maktabah Madbulah, t. Th.

Kuswanto, W. (2019). Antara Tafsir dan Hermeneutika. CENDEKIA Jaya, 1(1), 63–71.

Mainiyo, A. S., & Sule, M. M. (2023). Impact of Qur’anic Moral Excellence on the Lives of Muslim Society: An Exposition. Demak Universal Journal of Islam and Sharia, 1(03), 188–205.

Malula, M. (2019). Ma’nacum Maghza sebagai Metode dalam Kontekstualisasi Hadis Musykil (Telaah Pemikiran dan Aplikasi Hermeneutika Sahiron Syamsudin). Jurnal Ilmiah Citra Ilmu, 15(29), 29–38.

Mubarok, M. F., & Barkia, Z. R. (2021). Metode Tafsir Maudhu’i (Tawhidi) dan Langkah-Langkah Menurut Pandangan Ayatullah Muhammad Baqir Shadr. In E. Zulaiha & M. T. Rahman (Eds.), Makna dan Manfaat Tafsir Maudhu’i (pp. 72–92). Prodi S2 Studi Agama-Agama UIN Sunan Gunung Djati Bandung.

Mustaqim, A. (2010). Epistemologi tafsir kontemporer. LKiS.

Rahmadi, D. (2017). Kasus penistaan agama oleh Ahok hingga dibui 2 tahun. Merdeka. Com.

Rahman, M. T. (2020). Filsafat Ilmu Pengetahuan. Prodi S2 Studi Agama-Agama UIN Sunan Gunung Djati Bandung.

Robikah, S. (2020). Reinterpretasi Kata Jilbab Dan Khimar Dalam Al-Quran; Pendekatan Ma’na Cum Maghza Sahiron Syamsuddin. IJouGS: Indonesian Journal of Gender Studies, 1(1), 41–56.

Saeed, A. (2003). The official ulema and religious legitimacy of the modern nation state. In Islam and political legitimacy (pp. 14–28). Routledge.

Shihab, M. Q. (2015). Kaidah Tafsir. Lentera Hati.

Syahrur, M. (1990). Al-Kitab wa al-Qur’an: Qira’ah Mu’ashirah. Damaskus: Al-Ahali Al-‘Atiba’Wa Al-Nashr Wa Al-Tauzi.

Syamsuddin, S. (2017). Hermeneutika dan Pengembangan Ulumul Qur’an. Pesantren Nawasea Press.

Syamsuddin, S. (2020). Pendekatan Ma‟ na-Kum-Magzha Atas Hadis Al-Qur‟ an Dan Hadis: Menjawab Problematika Sosial Keagamaan Di Era Kontemporer. Yogyakarta: Asosiasi Alquran & Tafsir Se Indonesia.

Tilawati, A., & Kamala, A. E. (2020). Syura dan Demokrasi Perspektif Hermeneutika Abdullah Saeed: Relevansinya dengan Demokrasi di Indonesia. Sophist: Jurnal Sosial Politik Kajian Islam Dan Tafsir, 2(1), 38–60.

Yunus, B. M., & Jamil, S. (2020). Penafsiran Ayat-Ayat Mutasyabihat dalam Kitab Shafwah Al-Tafasir (E. Zulaiha & M. T. Rahman (eds.)). Prodi S2 Studi Agama-Agama UIN Sunan Gunung Djati Bandung.

Zaenudin, Z. (2020). Analisis Hermeneutika Dan Tekstualisme Al-Qur’an (Dari Klasik Hingga Kontemporer). Al-Afkar, Journal For Islamic Studies, 137–163.




DOI: https://doi.org/10.15575/jis.v5i1.37956

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

JIS is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.>

 

Published by: Prodi S2 Studi Agama-Agama UIN Sunan Gunung Djati Bandung