Implementation of The Thematic-Integrative Learning to Enhance Students Skill in The 4.0 Era
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.15575/jpi.v7i2.15220Keywords:
Revolution of 4.0, Students' Ability, Thematic-Integrative learning.Abstract
This research aims to describe the design of thematic-integrative learning model, its implementation in the learning process, the influence of the model on enhancing students' 4C's skill (Communication, Cooperative, Critical thinking, Creativity), and the analysis of the supporting hindering factors that may affect the implementation of the learning model. The research utilized a qualitative approach with a descriptive analytics method. This study collected its data through an interview, observation, and documentation. The result reveals that thematic-integrative learning can increase students' ability in the era of 4.0. The outcome is demonstrated by students' competency in formulating a project and its report. Thus, it is shown that students' capability in using technology, collaboration, written and spoken communication, self-management, critical and creative thinking, and problem-solving can be sharpened. Moreover, the supporting factors found in this research are a competent teacher, learning curriculum, active students, school facilities and expenses. On the other hand, the factors that may hinder the implementation are the disparity of the teachers' proficiency, the integration of curriculum, which is often inaccurate, students' unique character and capability, facilities that are not yet optimal, and an extensive cost for projects and performances.Â
References
Abdalla, M. M., Oliveira, L. G. L., Azevedo, C. E. F., & Gonzalez, R. K. (2018). Quality in qualitative organizational research: Types of triangulation as a methodological alternative. Administração: ensino e pesquisa, 19(1). DOI: https://doi.org/10.13058/raep.2018.v19n1.578
Abdullah, R. (2017). Pembelajaran dalam perspektif kreativitas guru dalam pemanfaatan media pembelajaran. Lantanida Journal, 4(1), 35-49. http://dx.doi.org/10.22373/lj.v4i1.1866
Abdullah, M. (2016). Pengembangan Indikator Kinerja Kunci Tambahan (Ikkt) Dalam Pendidikan Agama Islam Pada Sekolah Menuju Rintisan Sekolah Bertaraf Internasional (RSBI) Di SMP Laboratorium Upi. Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan, 16(1): 94-101. DOI: https://doi.org/10.17509/jpp.v16i1.2492
Barron, B., & Darling-Hammond, L. (2008). Teaching for meaningful learning:A review of research on inquiry-based and cooperative learning. Book Excerpt.
Butler, H. A., Pentoney, C., & Bong, M. P. (2017). Predicting real-world outcomes: Critical thinking ability is a better predictor of life decisions than intelligence. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 25, 38-46. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2017.06.005
Chotimah, C., Nisa, K. (2019). Penerapan Kurikulum Bertaraf Internasional Di MA Amanatul Ummah Pacet. DINAMIKA: Jurnal Kajian Pendidikan Dan Keislaman, 4(2), 79-96. DOI: https://doi.org/10.32764/dinamika.v4i2.786
Dallimore, E. J., Hertenstein, J. H., & Platt, M. B. (2008). Using discussion pedagogy to enhance oral and written communication skills. College Teaching, 56(3), 163-172. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3200/CTCH.56.3.163-172.
Davis, D. R., Ellett, C. D., & Annunziata, J. (2002). Teacher evaluation, leadership and learning organizations. Journal of Personnel Evaluation in Education, 16(4), 287-301. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1021791907098
Dewi, P. Y., & Primayana, K. H. (2019). Effect of learning module with setting contextual teaching and learning to increase the understanding of concepts. International Journal of Education and Learning, 1(1), 19-26. DOI: 10.31763/ijele.v1i1.26.
ErdoÄŸan, V. (2019). Integrating 4C skills of 21st century into 4 language skills in EFL classes. International Journal of Education and Research, 7(11), 113-124.
Hager, P. (2013). Frontâ€loading, workplace learning and skill development. Educational Philosophy and Theory, 36(5), 523-534. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-5812.2004.088_1.x
Handayani, M. (2018). Developing thematic-integrative learning module with problem-based learning model for elementary school students. Jurnal Prima Edukasia, 6(2), 166-176. DOI: 10.21831/jpe.v6i2.14288.
Hanington, B., & Martin, B. (2019). Universal methods of design expanded and revised: 125 Ways to research complex problems, develop innovative ideas, and design effective solutions. Rockport publishers.
Harvey, L. (2002). Evaluation for what?. Teaching in higher education, 7(3), 245-263. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/13562510220144761.
Hastuti, H. D., & Marsigit, M. (2020). Character Education Application in Thematic-Integrative Learning of Curriculum 2013. Formatif: Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan MIPA, 10(1): 35-46. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.30998/formatif.v10i1.4735.
Kanji, H., Nursalam, N., Nawir, M., & Suardi, S. (2020). Supporting and Inhibiting Factors of Character Education in Learning Social Studies at Primary Schools. JED (Journal of Etika Demokrasi), 5(1), 1-14. DOI: https://doi.org/10.26618/jed.v5i1.2966.
Koper, R., & Tattersall, C. (Eds.). (2005). Learning design: A handbook on modelling and delivering networked education and training. Springer Science & Business Media.
IMSTEP-JICA. (1999). Permasalahan pembelajaran matematika SD, SLTP, dan SMU di kota Bandung. FPMIPA UPI.
Khoeriyah, N. M., & Mawardi, M. (2018). Penerapan Desain Pembelajaran Tematik Integratif Alternatif Berbasis Kearifan Lokal untuk Meningkatkan Hasil dan Kebermaknaan Belajar. Mimbar Sekolah Dasar, 5(2), 63-74. DOI: https://doi.org/10.53400/mimbar-sd.v5i2.11444
Kipper, L. M., Iepsen, S., Dal Forno, A. J., Frozza, R., Furstenau, L., Agnes, J., & Cossul, D. (2021). Scientific mapping to identify competencies required by industry 4.0. Technology in Society, 64, 101454. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techsoc.2020.101454
Ledward, B. C., & Hirata, D. (2011). An overview of 21st century skills. Summary of 21st century skills for students and teachers, by Pacific policy research. Kamehameha Schools-Research and Evaluation .
Lessy, Z., & Sabi'ati, A. (2018). Thematic-Integrative Learning with the Beyond Centers and Circle Time Approach at Tunas Harapan Preschool, Salatiga, Central Java. Asia-Pacific Journal of Research in Early Childhood Education, 12(1): 39-59. DOI: 10.17206/apjrece.2018.12.1.39.
Makridakis, S. (2017). The forthcoming Artificial Intelligence (AI) revolution: Its impact on society and firms. Futures, 90, 46-60. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.futures.2017.03.006
Maryanti, N., Rohana, R., & Kristiawan, M. (2020). The Principal’s Strategy In Preparing Students Ready To Face the Industrial Revolution 4.0. International Journal of Educational Review, 2(1), 54-69. DOI: https://doi.org/10.33369/ijer.v2i1.10628
Mujianto, G. (2019). Peningkatan Hasil Belajar Menyusun Teks Laporan Hasil Observasi Pada Peserta Didik Kelas X SMAN 7 Malang Dengan Model Pembelajaran Integratif. JINoP (Jurnal Inovasi Pembelajaran), 5(1), 39-54. https://ejournal.umm.ac.id/index.php/jinop
Octavia, E. T. (2020). How Do School Facilities Affect School Quality? Case Study in Vocational High School at Pati, Indonesia. KnE Social Sciences, 865-881. DOI: https://doi.org/10.18502/kss.v4i6.6648.
Rose, D. (2000). Universal design for learning. Journal of Special Education Technology, 15(3), 45-49. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/016264340001500307
Scott, C. L. (2015). The futures of learning 1:Why must learning content and methods change in the 21st century? (No. 13; ERF).
Selznick, B. S., Dahl, L. S., Youngerman, E., & Mayhew, M. J. (2021). Equitably linking integrative learning and students’ innovation capacities. Innovative Higher Education, 1-21. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10755-021-09570-w
Siswanto, R. D., Dadan, D., Akbar, P., & Bernard, M. (2018). Penerapan Model Pembelajaran Kooperatif Tipe Auditorial, Intelectually, Repetition (Air) Untuk Meningkatkan Pemecahan Masalah Siswa Smk Kelas XI. Journal on Education, 1(1), 66-74. DOI: https://doi.org/10.31004/joe.v1i1.12
Sulfemi, W. B. (2019). Penerapan model pembelajaran discovery learning meningkatkan motivasi dan hasil belajar pendidikan kewarganegaraan. Jurnal Rontal Keilmuan Pancasila dan Kewarganegaraan, 5(1).
Supena, I., Darmuki, A., & Hariyadi, A. (2021). The Influence of 4C (Constructive, Critical, Creativity, Collaborative) Learning Model on Students' Learning Outcomes. International Journal of Instruction, 14(3), 873-892. ERIC Number: EJ1304598
Susanto, E. (2011). Pelaksanaan pendidikan agama islam multikultural di rintisan sekolah bertaraf internasional sman 1 pamekasan. NUANSA: Jurnal Penelitian Ilmu Sosial dan Keagamaan Islam, 8(2): 169-182. DOI: https://doi.org/10.19105/nuansa.v8i2.11
Trilling, B., & Fadel, C. (2009). 21st century skills: Learning for life in our times. Josey-Bass/Wiley.
Wechsler, S. M., Saiz, C., Rivas, S. F., Vendramini, C. M. M., Almeida, L. S., Mundim, M. C., & Franco, A. (2018). Creative and critical thinking: Independent or overlapping components?. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 27, 114-122. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2017.12.003
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-SA 4.0) License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
