Achieving Graduate Competency Standards: Impact of The Excellence Program
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.15575/jpi.v4i1.1581Keywords:
Quality, Graduate Competency Standards, Excellence Program.Abstract
The purpose of this paper is to reveal the results of the efforts and strategies to improve the quality of graduates in achieving competency standards in FTIK (Fakultas Keguruan dan Ilmu Pendidikan/Faculty of Education and Teacher Training) at The State Islamic University of Malang, Indonesia. The existing challenge today, namely the ASEAN Economic Community (AEC) in which the human resources with special requirements, is to be able to compete and work at any positions wherever they want. An Islamic college, particularly the FTIK where the prospective educators are “bornâ€, should be able to produce graduates who have both national and international qualifications. As a result, it demands the necessary management and strategies to achieve SKL (Standar Kompetensi Lulusan/ Graduate Competency Standard). This study uses qualitative approach with field research type. Strategies to guarantee the quality of graduates done through tight assessment, provision of extra programs that can improve the students' academic quality, continuous assessment, and the students’ scientific work must be written in either English or Arabic. Excellence program has a positive impact either on students who want to continue to pursue higher education or students who choose to work. The graduates of excellence programs are proven to have tough mentality as well as high work ethics.
References
Alfian, E. (2011). Dampak sertifikasi guru terhadap peningkatan mutu proses pembelajaran: Studi kasus di MAN Model Jambi. Media Akademia, 26(2), 278–295. Retrieved from https://bit.ly/2MqVWFt
Barnett, R. (1992). Improving higher education: Total quality care. 1900 Frost Rd., Suite 101, Bristol, PA 19007: Open University Press.
Beare, H., Caldwell, B. J., & Millikan, R. H. (2018). Creating an excellent school: Some new management techniques. Routledge.
Bogdan, R. C., & Taylor, S. J. (1992). Pengantar metode penelitian kualitatif. Translation by Arief Furchan. Surabaya: Usaha Nasional.
Burnham, J. W. (1997). Managing quality in school: Effective strategies for quality based school improvement. London: Prantice Hall.
Carter, D. J. (2004). Affirming diversity: The sociopolitical context of multicultural education. Harvard Educational Review, 74(4), 465.
Cronbach, L. J. (2000). Evaluation models. In Course improvement through evaluation. Dordrecht: Springer.
Darling-Hammond, L., & Lieberman, A. (2013). Teacher education around the world: Changing policies and practices. Routledge.
Scheme for Academic Mobility and Exchange. Direktorat Jenderal Sumber Daya IPTEK dan Pendidikan Tinggi Kementerian Riset, Teknologi, dan Pendidikan Tinggi 2017.
Findlow, S. (2006). Higher education and linguistic dualism in the Arab Gulf. British Journal of Sociology of Education, 27(1), 19-36. https://doi.org/10.1080/01425690500376754
Fitri, A. Z. (2013). Manajemen kurikulum pendidikan Islam. Bandung: Alfabeta.
Fitri, A. Z. (2016). Quality Assurance system between the Islamic State University and the State University. Jurnal Pendidikan Islam, 2(2), 208–230. https://doi.org/DOI: https://doi.org/10.15575/jpi.v2i2.787
Fullan, M., & Pomfret, A. (1977). Research on curriculum and instruction implementation. Review of educational research, 47(2), 335–397. https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543047002335
Herliana, L. (2003). Isu-isu aktual sekolah dalam dunia pendidikan. Bandung: PPPGF.
Heryanto, E., & Mabnun, B. N. (1993). Pengendalian mutu terpadu. Jakarta: Pustakan Binaman Pressindo. Gramedia.
Idrus, I. (1999). Towards quality higher education in Indonesia. Quality Assurance in Education, 7(3), 134–141. https://doi.org/10.1108/09684889910281566
House of Representatives of the Republic of Indonesia. The Law of the Republic of Indonesia Number 14 Year 2005 on Teachers and Lecturers.
Maimun, & Fitri, A. Z. (2010). Madrasah unggulan: Lembaga pendidikan alternatif di era kompetitif. Malang: UIN Press.
Makondo, L., & Ndebele, C. (2014). University lecturers’ views on student-lecturer evaluations. The Anthropologist, 17(2), 377-386. Retrieved from https://www.researchgate.net/ publication/289060726_University_Lecturers'_Views_on_Student-Lecturer_Evaluations
Mitchell, B. M. (1969). Small class size: A panacea for educational ills? Peabody Journal of Education, 47(1), 32–35. https://doi.org/10.1080/01619566909537672
Mostafa, G. M. (2007). Correcting the image of Islam and Muslims in the West: Challenges and opportunities for Islamic universities and organizations. Journal of Muslim Minority Affairs, 27(3), 371–386. https://doi.org/10.1080/13602000701737210
Ogunsanya, M. E., Bamgbade, B. A., Thach, A. V., Sudhapalli, P., & Rascati, K. L. (2018). Determinants of health-related quality of life in international graduate students. Pharmacy Teaching and Learning, 10(4), 413–422. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cptl.2017.12.005
Okwu, O. J. (2006). A critique of students’ vices and the effect on quality of graduates of Nigerian tertiary institutions. Journal of Social Sciences, 12(3), 193-198. https://doi.org/10.1080/09718923.2006.11978391
Ramirez, G. B., & Berger, J. B. (2014). Ranking, accreditation, and an international quest for quality: Organizing an approach to value in higher education. Quality Assurance in Education, 22(1), 89–100. https://doi.org/10.1108/QAE-07-2013-0031
Syahputra, H. (2013). Developing competitiveness and quality assurance in da’wa and communication faculty, Islamic State University Ar Raniry. Jurnal Al-Bayan, 19(27), 77–92. http://dx.doi.org/10.22373/albayan.v19i27.99
Trott, J. R. (1963). Lectures, lecturers, and the lectured. Improving College and University Teaching, 11(2), 72–75. https://doi.org/10.1080/00193089.1963.10532218
Waridjan et.al. (1984). Pengembangan kurikulum dan sistem instruksional. Jakarta: Depdikbud.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-SA 4.0) License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
