Reconstructing Legal Protection Regulations for Parties in Franchise Agreements Based on Dignified Justice


Suhaila Zulkifli(1*), Tajuddin Noor(2)

(1) Universitas Prima Indonesia, Indonesia
(2) Universitas Islam Sumatera Utara, Indonesia
(*) Corresponding Author

Abstract


Franchise agreements are recognized globally and Indonesia is experiencing significant growth in this industry. However, weaknesses in existing regulations, particularly Government Regulation No. 42 of 2007 and Minister of Trade Regulation No. 71 of 2019 hinder legal certainty and protection for franchisors and franchisees. This research aims to reconstruct Article 8 of Government Regulation No. 42/2007 on franchising to improve legal certainty and protection and promote justice for all parties involved. A critical review of Article 8 of Government Regulation No. 42/2007 reveals an ambiguity in the term ‘sustainable’, which can lead to various interpretations and potential legal conflicts. The research findings show that adding the word ‘periodically’ before the word ‘sustainable’ in Article 8 will provide clearer guidelines for franchisors regarding their obligation to guide the form of training, operational management, marketing, research, and development to franchisees. Using the normative juridical method, this research analyses secondary data from relevant laws and regulations. The insights gained can inform policymakers and stakeholders on reforms that need to be made to improve legal clarity. Implementing these recommendations may result in a more balanced power dynamic between franchisors and franchisees, which may ultimately contribute to the sustainable growth of the franchise industry in Indonesia. In conclusion, addressing vagueness in franchise agreements is critical to creating a fair business environment, and bringing dignified justice to the parties. Clarity in regulation will not only protect the rights of franchisors and franchisees but also promote the growth and stability of the franchise sector in Indonesia.

Keywords


Dignified justice; Franchise agreements; Legal protection; Reconstruction

Full Text:

PDF

References


Al-Fatih, S. (2023). Perkembangan Metode Penelitian Hukum di Indonesia. UMMPress.

Abdulkadir, M. (2010). Hukum Perusahaan Indonesia. Bandung: PT. Citra Aditya Bakti.

Awaluddin, M. V. (2013). Aspek Yuridis Perjanjian Waralaba Sebagai Perjanjian Khusus. Lex Privatum, 1(1).

Baker, M. (2023). Franchising in the Global Market. Business Expert Press.

Dant, R. P., & Grünhagen, M. (2021). The Role of Franchising in Contemporary Business. Journal of Business Research.

Deviana, N. T., & Urbaniasi, U. (2023). Menantea Franchise Agreement Case Analysis Reviewed from the KUHPer. AURELIA: Jurnal Penelitian dan Pengabdian Masyarakat Indonesia, 2(2), 1274-1278.

Dimatteo, L. A. (2003). The Law of International Business Transactions.

Lasamahu, F. R. (2006). Perlindungan Hukum Terhadap Franchisee dalam Perjanjian Waralaba (studi kasus: Analisis Putusan Pengadilan Antara PT. Lingkar Natura Inti dan Natasha Kasakeyan). Jurnal Hukum dan Pembangunan Tahun ke-36 No, 3, 306-329.

Fuady, M., & Kontrak, H. (2001). Dari Sudut Pandang Hukum Bisnis. Buku Pertama Jakarta: PT Citra Aditya Bakti

Hidayat & Respati (2022), Jurnal Hukum Bisnis Indonesia, 46

Hidayat, R. (2022). Franchising in Indonesia: A Historical Overview. Jurnal Ekonomi & Bisnis.

Hoffman, A. (2022). Franchise Types and Operations. Franchise Journal.

Justis, R. T., & Judd, R. J. (2007). Franchising: An Entrepreneur’s Guide. Cengage Learning, SAD.

Karo, R. P. P. K. (2022). Borrower's Right to a Sense of Security in Illegal Peer to Peer Lending in Indonesia Perspective of Dignified Justice Theory. J. Legal Ethical & Regul. Isses, 25, 1.

Kaufmann, P. J. (2022). The Evolution of Franchising: A Historical Perspective. Franchise Journal.

Klein, S. (2023). Franchise Management: A Comprehensive Guide. Business Expert Press.

Lafontaine, F., & Shaw, K. L. (2021). Franchising: A Business Strategy for Growth. International Journal of Franchise Management.

Lumoindong, H. (2020). Waralaba dan Perkembangannya. Retrieved June 11, 2023, from http://www.Paroki_teresa.tripod.com/ tonikum_waralaba.

Negara, T. A. S. (2023). Normative legal research in Indonesia: Its originis and approaches. Audito Comparative Law Journal (ACLJ), 4(1), 1–9.

Prasetyo, T. (2015). Keadilan Bermartabat Perspektif Teori Hukum. Nusa Media.

Raharjo, S. (2000). Ilmu Hukum. PT.Citra Aditya Bakti.

Rahma, E. S. (2014). Kedudukan Tidak Seimbang pada Perjanjian Waralaba berkaitan dengan Pemenuhan Kondisi Wanprestasi. Law Reform, 10(1), 16–30.

Setiawan, R. A., & Valentino, O. (2011). Menjamurnya Usaha Franchise di Yogyakarta (Tahu Bulat Tiara). Jurnal Manajemen, 1(1), 50-53.

Salim, H. S. (2006). Perkembangan Hukum Kontrak di Luar KUH Perdata. RajaGrafindo Persada.

Salim Hs, S. H. (2019). Perkembangan hukum kontrak innominaat di Indonesia. Sinar Grafika.

Selamet,S.R.(2022).Waralaba (franchise) di Indonesia. Lex Jurnal, 8 (morr 2). https://ejurnal.esaunggul.ac.id/index.php/Lex/article/view/325.

Setiawan, D. (2007). Franchise Guide Series. Jakarta: Dian Rakyat.

Sumartiah S, (2019),Keberadaan Bisnis Waralaba Berkaitan Dengan Haki Yang Dimiliki Oleh Pihak Pemberi Waralaba Pada UMKM (Di Kota Yogyakarta)

Temesgen, E. Y. (2016). Haramaya law review, 5(1).

Widjaya, G. (2001). Waralaba (pp. 4–5). Rajawali Pers.




DOI: https://doi.org/10.15575/kh.v6i3.35538

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2024 Suhaila Zulkifli

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Jl. Raya A.H. Nasution No. 105 Cibiru Kota Bandung, 40614

E-mail: KHukum@uinsgd.ac.id

Lisensi Creative Commons

Khazanah Hukum are licensed under Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International