Rasch Model Application: Instrument Development of Readiness to Conduct Inclusive Learning
Main Article Content
Abstract
This study aims to analyze development of an instrument that measures the level of readiness of Islamic Education (PAI) prospective teachers in conducting inclusive learning. The process was conducted by investigating three important indicators, namely: (1) motivation and value, (2) content-related, and (3) operational and pragmatist. The method employed was a non-experimental quantitative design which was considered a pilot test. Data were collected from 144 samples of PAI students who are prospective teachers from two private universities in Yogyakarta, and the tool used was a questionnaire which was analyzed using Rasch Model measurement software called WINSTEPS. Furthermore, it was used to determine the validity and reliability of items, respondents, and instrument. The results showed that development of readiness instrument in conducting inclusive learning using Rasch model consisted of 34 items with a coefficient of instrument, item, and respondent reliability of 92, 90, and 92, respectively. Therefore, it was discovered that instrument has good psychometric properties and can be used effectively.
Article Details
The author whose published manuscript approved the following provisions:
1. The right of publication of all material published in the journal / published on the E-Journal of Psychology website is held by the editorial board with the knowledge of the author (moral right remains the author of the script).
2. The formal legal provisions for access to digital articles of this electronic journal are subject to the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike license (CC BY-SA), which means that the Journal of Psychology reserves the right to save, transmit media / format, manage in database form, , maintain, and publish articles without requesting permission from the Author as long as it continues to include the name of the Author as the owner of Copyright.
3. Printed and published print and electronic manuscripts are open access for any purposes. In addition to these objectives, the editorial board shall not be liable for violations of copyright law.
Â
References
Ainscow, M., & Sandill, A. (2010). Developing inclusive education systems: The role of organizational cultures and leadership. International Journal of Inclusive Education, 14(4), 401–416. https://doi.org/10.1080/13603110802504903
Andriana, E., & Evans, D. (2020). Listening to the voices of students on inclusive education: Responses from principals and teachers in Indonesia. International Journal of Educational Research, 103(5), 101644. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijer.2020.101644
Asri, D. N., Cahyono, B. E. H., & Trisnani, R. P. (2021). Early reading learning for special needs students: Challenges on inclusive primary school during COVID-19 pandemic. Linguistics and Culture Review, 5(S1), 1062–1074. https://dx.doi.org/10.21744/lingcure.v5nS1.1489
Baimenova, B., Bekova, Z., & Saule, Z. (2015). Psychological readiness of future educational psychologists for the work with children in the conditions of inclusive education. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 205(May), 577–583. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.09.082
Boyle, C., Anderson, J., & Allen, K-A. (2020). The importance of teacher attitudes to inclusive education. In C. Boyle, J. Anderson, A. Page & S. Mavropoulou (Eds.), Inclusive education: Global issues and controversies (pp. 127–146). Brill.
Ediyanto, Maulida, R., Atika, I. N., & Kawai, N. (2020). The pre-service teachers’ attitudes towards inclusive education: An empirical study in Yogyakarta city, Indonesia. Discourse and Communication for Sustainable Education, 11(1), 65-73. http://dx.doi.org/10.2478/dcse-2020-0007
Faragher, R., Chen, M., Miranda, L., Poon, K., Chang, F., & Chen, H. (2021). Inclusive education in Asia: Insights from some country case studies. Journal of Policy and Practice in Intellectual Disabilities, 18(1), 23-35 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/jppi.12369.
Fisher, W. P. J. (2018). Rating Scale instrument quality criteria. https://www.rasch.org/rmt/rmt211m.htm
Florian, L. (2012). Preparing teachers to work in inclusive classrooms: Key lessons for the professional development of teacher educators from Scotland’s inclusive practice project. Journal of Teacher Education, 63(4), 275-285. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022487112447112
Forlin, C., & Chambers, D. (2011). Teacher preparation for inclusive education: Increasing knowledge but raising concerns. Asia-Pacific Journal of Teacher Education, 39(1), 17-32. https://doi.org/10.1080/1359866X.2010.540850
Humaira, M. A., Rachmadtullah, R., & Aliyyah, R. R. (2021). Perceptions of student teachers on collaborative relationships between university and inclusive elementary schools: A case study in Indonesia. International Journal of Learning, Teaching and Educational Research, 20(10). https://doi.org/10.26803/ijlter.20.10.15
Isosomppi, L., & Leivo, M. (2015). Becoming an inclusive teacher at the interface of school and teacher education. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 171, 686–694. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.01.178
Keddie, A. (2012). Educating for diversity and social justice. Routledge.
Leifler, E. (2020). Teachers’ capacity to create inclusive learning environments. International Journal for Lesson & Learning Studies, 9(3), 221–244. http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/IJLLS-01-2020-0003
Moberg, S., Muta, E., Korenaga, K., Kuorelahti, M., & Savolainen, H. (2020). Struggling for inclusive education in Japan and Finland: teachers’ attitudes towards inclusive education. European Journal of Special Needs Education, 35(1), 100–114. https://doi.org/10.1080/08856257.2019.1615800
Movkebayeva, Z. A., Oralkanova, I. A., Mazhinov, B. M., Beisenova, A. B., & Belenko, O. G. (2016). Model of formation for readiness to work within inclusive education in teachers. International Journal of Environmental & Science Education, 11(11), 4680-4689.
Mukminin, A., Habibi, A., Prasojo, L. D., Idi, A., & Hamidah, A. (2019). Curriculum reform in Indonesia: Moving from an exclusive to inclusive curriculum. CEPS Journal, 9(2), 53–72. https://doi.org/10.26529/cepsj.543
Munika, C., Suwarjo, S., & Sutanti, N. (2022). Validation of the mindset scale in the Indonesian context: A Rasch model analysis. International Online Journal of Education and Teaching, 9(4), 1458–1469.
NJCIE. (2018). Quality indicators for effective inclusive education guidebook. New Jersey Council on Developmental Disabilities, New Jersey Coalition for Inclusive Education.
Poernomo, B. (2016). The implementation of inclusive education in Indonesia : Current problems and challenges. American International Journal of Social Science, 5(3), 144–150.
Qandhi, F. F., & Kurniawati, F. (2019). Pre-service teachers’ attitudes toward inclusive education. Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Intervention and Applied Psychology (ICIAP 2018), 588–601. https://doi.org/10.2991/iciap-18.2019.50
Rante, S. V. N., & Tulak, H. (2020). Far from expectation: A systematic literature review of inclusive education in Indonesia. Universal Journal of Educational Research, 8(11B), 6340-6350. http://dx.doi.org/10.13189/ujer.2020.082273
Rasmitadila, R., Humaira, M. A., Rachmadtullah, R., Sesrita, A., Laeli, S., Muhdiyati, I., & Firmansyah, W. (2021). Teacher perceptions of university mentoring programs planning for inclusive elementary schools: A case study in Indonesia. International Journal of Special Education (IJSE), 36(2), 53–65. https://doi.org/10.52291/ijse.2021.36.18
Rasmitadila, R., Humaira, M. A., & Rachmadtullah, R. (2022). Teachers’ perceptions of the role of universities in mentoring programs for inclusive elementary schools: A case study in Indonesia. Journal of Education and E-Learning Research, 8(3), 333–339.
Robitzsch, A. (2021). A comprehensive simulation study of estimation methods for the Rasch model. Stats, 4(4), 814–836. http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/stats4040048
Rost, J. (2001). The growing family of Rasch models. In A. Boomsma, M. A. J. van Duijn & T. A. B. Snijders (Eds.), Essays on item response theory. Lecture notes in statistics (pp. 25–42). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4613-0169-1_2
Saloviita, T. (2019). Teacher attitudes towards the inclusion of students with support needs. Journal of Research in Special Educational Needs, 20(1), 64–73. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/1471-3802.12466
Sumintono, B., & Widhiarso, W. (2015). Aplikasi permodelan rasch pada assessment pendidikan. Trim Komunikata.
Supratiwi, M., Yusuf, M., & Anggarani, F. K. (2021). Mapping the challenges in distance learning for students with disabilities during COVID-19 pandemic: Survey of special education teachers. International Journal of Pedagogy and Teacher Education, 5(1), 11–18. https://doi.org/10.20961/ijpte.v5i1.45970
Susanto, E., Novitasari, Y., Rakhmat, C., Hidayat, A., & Budi Wibowo, S. (2018). Rash model analysis of kaufman domains of creativity scale (K-DOCS) to Indonesian students. Journal of Physics Conference Series, 1114(1), 12027. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1114/1/012027
Tanang, H., & Abu, B. (2014). Teacher professionalism and professional development practices in South Sulawesi, Indonesia. Journal of Curriculum and Teaching, 3(2), 25–42. https://doi.org/10.5430/jct.v3n2p25
Zulfija, M., Indira, O., & Elmira, U. (2013). The professional competence of teachers in inclusive education. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 89, 549–554. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2013.08.892