An Analysis of Buffer Solution Topics in Chemistry Textbooks: Application of the 4 Step Teaching Material Development Criteria


Lisya Asmiati(1), Diah Kartika Sari(2*), Sanjaya Sanjaya(3), Made Sukaryawan(4), Eka Adhiya(5)

(1) Masters of Chemistry Education, Universitas Negeri Yogyakarta, Yogyakarta 55281, Indonesia
(2) Chemistry education study program, Sriwijaya University, Inderalaya Ogan Ilir-30662, Indonesia
(3) Chemistry education study program, Sriwijaya University, Inderalaya Ogan Ilir-30662, Indonesia
(4) Chemistry education study program, Sriwijaya University, Inderalaya Ogan Ilir-30662, Indonesia
(5) Chemistry education study program, Sriwijaya University, Inderalaya Ogan Ilir-30662, Indonesia
(*) Corresponding Author

Abstract


Buffer solution content in Chemistry textbooks plays a significant role in achieving these educational objectives. This study aims to analyze buffer solution material in class XI Chemistry textbooks using the 4S TMD selection criteria, focusing on curriculum consistency, concept accuracy, and value education. A qualitative evaluative approach was employed, comparing the data collected from two textbooks (Book A and Book B) against established standards. The evaluation covered the scope and depth of the material, the accuracy of concepts, and the integration of values. The analysis found that both textbooks included six relevant concept labels, though Book B contained one overly general label. Regarding concept depth, Book A had two concepts with insufficient depth, while Book B had one overly shallow concept and one excessively detailed. Both books achieved the standard for concept accuracy. For value education, Book A integrated six core values, such as discipline and responsibility, while Book B incorporated eleven values, including creativity, democracy, and honesty. The findings suggest that Book A aligns more closely with the 4S TMD evaluation criteria than Book B. This highlights the importance of balancing curriculum alignment, conceptual depth, and value integration in educational materials.

Keywords


4S TMD; buffer solution; chemistry textbooks

References


Anwar, S. (2015). Pengembangan bahan ajar. Program Pascasarjana, Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia. Bandung: tidak diterbitkan.

Anwar, S., Noviyanti, N., & Hendrawan. (2017). Analisis kelayakan buku teks kimia SMA/MA kelas X materi reaksi redoks berdasarkan kriteria tahap seleksi 4S TMD. Skripsi, Fakultas Matematika dan Ilmu Pengetahuan Alam: Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia.

Arikunto, S. (2013). Prosedur penelitian suatu pendekatan praktik. Jakarta: PT Rineka Cipta.

Bajarias, N., Ramos, R., Largo, P., De Guzman, R., Galicia, D. B., & Cayogyog, A. O. (2024). Dynamics of Curriculum Alignment: Experiences of Elementary School Teachers in Focus. International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science, 8(7), 1830-1850. Retrieved from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bcp/journl/v8y2024i7p1830-1850.html

Balitbang. (2010). Model pendidikan untuk pembangunan berkelanjutan kegiatan intrakurikuler. Jakarta: Kementerian Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan RI.

Brown, B., Boda, P., Ribay, K., Wilsey, M., & Perez, G. (2021). A technological bridge to equity: how VR designed through culturally relevant principles impact students appreciation of science. Learning, Media and Technology, 46(4), 564–584. https://doi.org/10.1080/17439884.2021.1948427

Darling-Hammond, L., Hyler, M. E., & Gardner, M. (2020). Effective teacher professional development. Learning Policy Institute. Retrieved from https://learningpolicyinstitute.org/product/effective-teacher-professional-development-report

Dewi, H. N. (2016). Analisis kelayakan buku teks kimia SMA/MA kelas XI materi larutan penyangga berdasarkan kriteria tahap seleksi dari 4S-TMD. Skripsi, Fakultas Matematika dan Ilmu Pengetahuan Alam: Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia.

Djarwo, C. F. (2019). Analisis Miskonsepsi Mahasiswa Pendidikan Kimia pada Materi Hidrokarbon. Jurnal Ilmiah IKIP Mataram, 6(2), 90-97. Retrieved from https://e-journal.undikma.ac.id/index.php/jiim/article/view/2788

Johnson, C. E., Boon, H. J., & Dinan Thompson, M. (2020). Curriculum alignment after reforms: a systematic review with considerations for queensland pre- and in-service teachers. Australian Journal of Teacher Education, 45(11). https://doi.org/10.14221/ajte.202v45n11.3

Lachman, S. J. (2010). Learning is a process: toward an improved definition of learning. Journal of Psychology, 131(5), 477–480. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/00223989709603535

Lam, B. H., & Tsui, K. T. (2013). Examining the alignment of subject learning outcomes and course curricula through curriculum mapping. Australian Journal of Teacher Education, 38(12). https://doi.org/10.14221/ajte.2013v38n12.8

Mouza, C., & Lavigne, N. (Eds.). (2013). Emerging technologies for the classroom: a learning sciences perspective. New York: Springer. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-4696-5

Mudlofir, A. (2011). Aplikasi pengembangan kurikulum tingkat satuan pendidikan dan bahan ajar dalam pendidikan agama islam. Depok: PT. Raja Grafindo Persada.

Polikoff, M. S. (2015). How well aligned are textbooks to the common core standards in mathematics?. American Educational Research Journal, 52(6). https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.3102/0002831215584435

Rusianti, S., & Fatah, A. H. (2019). Analisis kesesuaian konsep ikatan kimia pada buku kimia kelas X SMA/MA terhadap silabus kurikulum 2013 dan penyusunan makro wacana. Jurnal Ilmiah Kanderang Tingang, 10(2), 184-200. https://doi.org/10.37304/jikt.v10i2.32

Sadler, P. M., Sonnert, G., Coyle, H. P., Cook-Smith, N., & Miller, J. L. (2013). The influence of teachers’ knowledge on student learning in middle-school physical science classrooms. American Educational, 50(5), 1020–1049. https://doi.org/10.3102/0002831213477680

Salame, I., Ramirez, L., Nikolic, D., & Krauss, D. (2022). Investigating Students’ Difficulties and Approaches to Solving Buffer Related Problems. International Journal of Instruction, 15(1), 911–926. https://doi.org/10.29333/iji.2022.15152a

Sanjaya, W. (2011). Strategi pembelajaran berorientasi standar proses pendidikan. Jakarta: Kencana Prenada media.

Shulman, L. S. (2004). The wisdom of practice: Essays on teaching, learning, and learning to teach. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

Stephanie, M. M., Fitriyani, D., Paristiowati, M., Moersilah, M., Yusmaniar, Y., & Rahmawati, Y. (2019). Analisis Miskonsepsi Pada Materi Larutan Penyangga Menggunakan Two-Tier Diagnostic Test. Jurnal Riset Pendidikan Kimia (JRPK), 9(2), 58–66. https://doi.org/10.21009/JRPK.092.01

Susila. (2019). Analisis Kelayakan materi larutan asam dan basa pada buku teks kimia SMA/MA Kelas XI Berdasarkan Kriteria Tahap Seleksi dari 4S TMD. Skripsi, Fakultas Matematika dan Ilmu Pengetahuan Alam: Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia.

Tekir, S., & Akar, H. (2019). The current state of instructional materials education: Aligning policy, standards, and teacher education curriculum. Educational Sciences: Theory and Practice, 19(1), 22–40. https://doi.org/10.12738/estp.2019.1.043

UNESCO. (2020). Education for sustainable development: Goals and objectives. United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization. https://en.unesco.org/themes/education-sustainable-development

Vaclavik, M., Tomasek, M., Cervenkova, I., & Baarova, B. (2022). Analysis of Quality Teaching and Learning from Perspective of University Students. Education Sciences, 12(11), 820. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci12110820




DOI: https://doi.org/10.15575/jtk.v9i2.40460

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2024 Lisya Asmiati, Diah Kartika Sari

Journal  Tadris Kimiya Is Indexed By : 

Lisensi Creative Commons

Chemistry Education: Jurnal Tadris Kimiya licensed with Lisensi Internasional Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 . Copyright is protected by law . p-ISSN: 2527-6816 | e-ISSN: 2527-9637